In on-premise database environments like Oracle and SQL Server there will usually be multiple physical servers and in each of them there will be multiple databases. For example, in a typical on-premise Oracle/SQL Server data warehouse environment, companies will have 3 separate sets of physical servers — one each for development, test and production.
In each of these physical servers, multiple databases will be created. Each of these databases will built be for a specific purpose for example one could be a financial systems warehouse (FIN_DW) with data pulled from ERP system and another could be a HR warehouse (HR_DW) with data pulled from HR systems and a third could be data from CRM systems like Salesforce which could be called CRM_DW. In each of the databases there can be multiple schema and in each schema, there can be multiple tables, views and other objects.
So, in total you could have 3 databases per server looking like this in your on-premise environment –
DEV/TEST/PROD Physical Server
In an on-premise environment the following picture depicts a typical hierarchy of objects
How Snowflake works
When a company signs up with Snowflake they are given an URL like
In Snowflake, a database is the highest level and inside a database there can be multiple schemas and inside a schema there can be multiple tables and views. So, in other words Snowflake does not have a server concept like Dev, Test or Production physical servers.
In Snowflake, the following picture depicts a typical hierarchy of objects
How to organize your on-premise databases in Snowflake
Given, that Snowflake environment is “one level lower” in terms of objects (there is no concept of dev, test and production physical servers) how do you organize the Snowflake system to match your on-premise setup. There are 2 ways to go about this –
1. Keep your top-level object as an individual database when you migrate
In this method, you will be creating as many databases in Snowflake as there are number of on-premise physical servers x number of databases in each of them.
In the above example you will create 9 databases in Snowflake –
This method will work fine if you have a small number of on-premise servers with a small number of databases in each of them. But your company could have 4–5 physical servers (Sandbox, Dev, Test, Production, etc.) with 10–20 databases in each of them. You can imagine how the number of databases can proliferate in Snowflake. In this example your looking at anywhere between 40 to 100 databases.
You will have to maintain all these databases within Snowflake and assign security and roles to each of them. In addition, in my opinion you will have a very confusing and cluttered environment to maintain many databases for the longer term.
One of the big issue I see is that normally production servers have a high degree of security and access control than dev or test servers. In the on-premise world the server and the databases in the production environment are audited and are under SOX control. In Snowflake if you end up having 10–20 production databases without an umbrella physical server it will become difficult to report out the internal controls to the audit team.
2. Create as many “dummy databases” as there are on-premise physical servers
In this method you create 3 databases in Snowflake at the top level –
This will represent the 3 physical servers in your on-premise environments. Then you can create the 3 on-premise databases (CRM_DW, HR_DW, FIN_DW) as schemas inside these 3 databases. If a database has multiple schemas you can create multiple schemas inside these databases. For example, if CRM_DW has 2 schemas called Marketing_Schema and Sales_Schema, you can create these as 2 separate schemas as CRM_DW_Marketing_Schema and CRM_DW_Sales_Schema under the Development, Test and Production databases. The respective tables and views can then be created under each of these schemas.
The advantage I see in this method is that you have a more structured way of looking at your Snowflake environment. You will have a Development, Test and Production database and then all schemas and tables that belong to each will be sitting inside these databases. You can put a greater level of security control to the Production database and will be able to prove to your auditors that you have similar controls to the production on-premise server.
The only downside I see to this approach is the case where you a lot of schemas under a database in your on-premise environment. In this case you will just have to rename your schemas with the database name in the front for example to distinguish them.
Before moving your on-premise data warehouses to Snowflake, it is necessary to put some thought into how you want to organize your Snowflake environment. Since you don’t have a concept of a physical development, test or production servers you can try to mimic it by using option 2 above. Option 2 will work well if you have a lot of databases inside each physical server and you have less number of schemas in each database. If you have a lot of schemas in each database and less number of databases in each physical server then option 1 might be better suited for your case.